P-ISSN: 2808-0467
E-ISSN: 2808-5051
Homepage: https://iss.internationaljournallabs.com/index.php/iss
617 This work is licensed under CC BY-SA 4.0
SACRIFICE AND TRIBUTE IN HOSEA 6:6: THE IMPLICATION OF
CONTEXTUAL WORSHIPPING
Tirta Susila
State Christian Institute of Palangkaraya, Indonesia
tirtasusisibot@gmail.com
PAPER INFO ABSTRACT
Received:
January 2022
Revised:
February 2022
Approved:
February 2022
Hosea was not the only prophet who saw and criticized the falsehood of the
Israelites' worship as God's people. Hosea's specialty, however, is that in his
preaching he repeatedly puts forward, and therefore, reflects a fairly detailed
theological concept of understanding the true, meaningful, and proper
worship of God's people. In his preaching, Hosea highlighted two things in
connection with Israel's worship, namely between the "loyal love / hesed and
knowing God / daat elohim" versus the "sacrifice" / zebakh and the burnt
offering/ola. The words hesed and daיat 'elohim are words and terms
(formulas) that reveal the essence of Hosea's theological understanding of the
true worship of Yahweh, which God's people should embody so that their
relationship with God is maintained. In this term, there is an understanding
of the "fundamental principles," "the premises," "the fundamental character,"
the "basic ideas," of worshiping Yahweh.
KEYWORDS
sacrifice, tribute, Hosea, contextual worshipping
INTRODUCTION
"For I love love, and not the sacrifice of slaughter, and love the knowledge of God, more
than the burnt offerings," the very stern and clear prophetic messages of the prophet Hosea
which we can read in Hosea 6:6.
It should be noted that sounds and messages like this are not typical and come from Hosea
alone. Based on existing biblical data, it turns out that these messages are typical of prophets,
just say from Samuel to Malachi (See, for example, 1 Samuel 15:22-23; Isa 1:11; Jer 7:22;
Amos 5:21f; Mika 6:6-8; Zechariah 7:5-7; Malachi 9:13; 12:7). From these verses, we listen
to the very sharp criticisms of the prophets against the falsehood of worship that is being carried
out by God's people. That is, Hosea is not the only prophet who saw and launched a sharp
criticism of the falsehood of worship of the Israelites as God's people. Nevertheless, I saw that
Hosea's specificity was that in his preaching he expressed it over and over again and therefore
reflected a fairly detailed concept of theological understanding of true, meaningful, and proper
worship by God's people.
In his message, Hosea presents two things with regard to the worship of Israel, namely
between the "love of hesed and the knowledge of Allah / daat elohim faced with the thing of
"sacrifice of slaughter"/ zebakh and burnt sacrifice/ola. The words hesed and daיat 'elohim are
words and formulas that reveal the essence of Hosea's theological understanding of true
compassion to Yahwe, which God's people should manifest so that their relationship with God
is maintained. In this term, there is an understanding of "fundamental principles," "basic
thoughts," "fundamental characters," "basic ideas," about worship to YAHWE.
Sacrifice and Tribute in Hosea 6:6: The Implication of Contextual Worshipping
618 Interdisciplinary Social Studies, 1(5), Feb 2022
METHOD
This research uses the method of literature review by examining the contents of certain
documents which in this case is the Book of Hosea. Then the author details the results of the
review in the next section.
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
Hosea 6:6
The word love is translated in (ESV=steadfast love), (NKJV= mercy), (RSV= steadfast
love). And the author uses the word mercy (NKJV) as the most likely translation, for This 6th
confirms more clearly what is said in verse 5. In this case in Hosea’s day, the prophet declared
that there was no faithfulness in the land of Israel (4:1). Only curse, lie, kill, steal, commit
adultery, commit violence, and shed blood for the shedding of blood (4:2) (Lange, 1884).
The word ḥā∙p
ēṣ: {I want}, means also desire, desire, that is, having feelings or attitudes
experiencing or having objects (Deuteronomy 25:7). The word (Swanson, 1997)
can also mean
to be liked, that is, relating to feelings or attitudes experiencing or possessing objects (1Ki 21:6;
Ps 40:15; 70: 3; Mal 3:1); pleasure, joy, i.e. with regard to a fondness or affection for an object
or experience (Neh. 1:11; Mzm 5: 5; 34:13; 35: 27; 111: 2); Willing, volunteering, that is,
pertaining to what is not by force, implies a voluntary choice (1Ki 13:33; 1Taw 28:9) (Strong,
1996)
.
ḥāpēṣ, also a verb meaning to please, to have pleasure, to have pleasure, to be happy
(Baker & Carpenter, 2003).
The phrase "and not the victim", 'velo'-zâvakh' is balanced with "more than the burnt
victims", - 'mê'olot'. It does not state absence or tendencies but rather priorities. "Faithful love"
and "knowledge of God" (Da'at 'Elohim) are the basic elements of the covenant and are the
final realities that give meaning to worship and life.
The sacrifices emphasized by the prophecy at the beginning (band. Leviticus 1-7)
contradict the false sacrifices made, which are a sign of the religious and moral destruction
built by Jeroboam (band. 1 Kings 12:27-29). Sacrifice, in general, is considered good because
it is a work that expresses symbols of trust and thanksgiving. When the sacrifice is not made
by strictly legal means, associated with ox statues and idolatry, pretending to honor God than
the sacrifice is only in the form of seeking god outside it, and cannot be sought from the heart
(band). Micah. 6:8; 1 Sam 1:11-17; 15:22; Psalm 40:7, 9; 1:8 etc; 51:18 etc (Ogilvie, 2004).
According to Limburg, when worship becomes preoccupied with liturgical pleasantries,
nuances of language, new things of music, art, and architecture, but forgets others, then worship
has been reduced to the truth of worship; And this is where the word, "I want to love and no
sacrifice" needs to be heard. Or when worship is understood only in terms of church attendance,
general decency, and doing what is desired, then worship has become reduced in meaning and
only to satisfy the rules. It is true that the word hesed in worship is the center or the point (band.
Mzm 136). Life is run to respond to God's love with faithful devotion to God and service of
love to others (Limburg, 2011).
Sacrifice itself is not evil, but measured less important than adherence to Jehovah’s desired
covenant due to deviation of the implementation of sacrifice (band. Psalm 51:17; Yes.1:11;
Mal.1:10). Another display of sacrifice turned them into miraculous acts that tried to
manipulate Yahweh and which He rejected. Every layer of society is guilty (6:10-11a). Judah
attacked Ephraim (5:10). Ephraim and Judah had both been wooed in support of Assyria (5:13).
Sacrifice and Tribute in Hosea 6:6: The Implication of Contextual Worshipping
619 Interdisciplinary Social Studies, 1(5), Feb 2022
Priests have disrupted social stability with murder conspiracy in violation of the provisions of
the Treaty of Yahweh (6:7-9). Conspiracy to murder for example when Baesa's son Ela
succeeded him, after ruling for two years he was killed by one of his officers, Zimri (I King
16:15-20) (Hubbard, 2009).
Faithful love and knowledge are distinguished but almost inseparable. Both are a form of
response to God, who has revealed himself to Israel through their historical events and
especially through the events of the exodus. Faithful love and good knowledge are related to
the covenant and are almost incomprehensible apart from it, and find expression in obedient
and faithful behavior. Therefore, the scathing commentary on Israel's faithful love certainly
implies that the knowledge they seek is sorely lacking, coming from their own imagination,
and not what God wants to be that is not to betray Him, to do good deeds, moral and ethical
actions that are not contrary to God's will, such as not condemning, deceiving, killing,
committing violence and shedding blood.
God's love is the faithful love required by the covenant. This is a person's kind of loyal
love for other members in the partnership because he has promised to love. It is a commitment
of will and not a function of emotion, and it is meant to last as long as the partnership lasts. A
partnership can't survive without it. The kind of love Israel offers false faithful love, worship
to the ever-changing gods of nature, is an as short life, as fog and morning dew. Such faithful
love is not related to any covenant; It was an emotion, not of will, and it was short-lived (Beeby,
1989).
The Lord in this verse states clearly that he wants mercy, and not sacrifice, and he did it to
prevent bad behavior and to anticipate all pretense that people do in worship. In practice or
generally, Israel maintains that they worship God, provided they offer sacrifices to him,
provided they work hard in ceremonies, and collect many rituals. They thought later that God
was made bound to them, and that they had fully carried out their duties. This crime has been
going on for a long time. The Prophet anticipated this embezzlement, and said, the mercy I
desire, and not the sacrificial offering. This is the main understanding or object of this verse.
The knowledge of God here is about faith or piety because hypocrites think that the worship of
God is right when they use many ceremonies. The Prophet mocked all the splendor and pointed
out that it was empty, and said, that worshiping God is much different; It is only done when it
is known. God wants to be worshipped; But they display only their rituals, and ignore the true
spiritual worship of God, who stands in faith and love.
More clearly according to Calvin learn from mem particles, when he says, meoulut, from
the burnt-out victims. This can bring about the contrast that God is inconsistent with himself
as if he rejects the sacrifices he himself has set (band. Leviticus 1:1-17); But what is meant is
that he condemns the abuse of the burnt offerings they offer, in which hypocrites boast on it
(Calvin, 2013).
Worship of During the Period of Hosea
The 'worship' affair that took place in Northern Israel during the time of the prophet Hosea
was an experience that was formed along with the election and formation of God's community
in the past. In the cult especially of the celebrations of Israel; Prayer, sabbath, and sacrifice are
nothing new in Israel's faith. Everything that "smells" of magic, prophecy, ancestor worship,
and prostitution worship is forbidden in Israel. God is holy and at the same time obeys His
Sacrifice and Tribute in Hosea 6:6: The Implication of Contextual Worshipping
620 Interdisciplinary Social Studies, 1(5), Feb 2022
commandments because they are god's chosen ones (Ps. 65:5, I Chr. 16:13). The formation of
the city of God with its temple means that people can build an altar preceded by the presence
of God after which the Lord comes and blesses them. In the life of Northern Israel, the use of
places of worship in Dan and Bethel by Jeroboam was not actually focused on God. The golden
bull calf which he said was "your gods" who had guided them in the Desert was a fraud. It is
not God's presence that takes precedence but political security and power.
The cult will also not be separated from sacrifice. Beeby stated that Hosea did not reject
all sacrifices, he condemned the violence and abuse that existed in those sacrifices. The
opposition is to abuse that is considered to be untrue. In the history of religions, there can be
seen the difference between sacrifice (with ideas of solidarity), this sacrifice is a gift and the
sacrifice for sin can be seen in Leviticus 1-7 and Numbers 28-29 (Beeby, 1989).
The type of sacrifice fellowship (zbh) in Ex.12:3 explains that communion of eating is part
of a ceremony involving the covenant of "berit". There are also sacrifices for thanksgiving,
peace, sacrifice gifts (smokes of peace), all of which have a purpose because the sacrifice in
the OT is a feature of the sanctification of God's people. The cult in the books of wisdom does
not play much of a big role, since wise men can overcome ethical problems in everyday life
and are oriented towards a secular society (Preuss, 1996).
The sacrifice emphasized by the prophecy at the beginning (the band Leviticus 1-7) is
contrary to the false sacrifices made, which are a sign of religious and moral destruction.
Sacrifice is only in the form of seeking God outside it alone, and cannot be the search of the
heart (band). Micah. 6:8; 1 Sam 1:11-17; 15:22; Psalm 40:7, 9; 1:8 etc; 51:18 etc (Ogilvie,
2004).
According to Hosea, covenant faithfulness and sincere recognition of Himself as the only
true God of the victimization system became God's desired goal. Sacrificial offerings without
sincere loyalty to God and true recognition of Him as the only true God are meaningless rituals.
What God wants is the heart of His people and devotion, not a ritual that only seems outside
(cf. Isa 1:11). Even worse, as Hosea has pointed out, this time of the sacrificial offerings made
was the chance of cultic prostitution, drunkenness, and honor of pagan gods (4:18-19; 5:3-5).
In Hosea, the official religion of Israel, corrupted by the satanic cult of Canaan, this fertility
cult provided a means to obtain good things from nature and God's will for the benefit of man.
People filled the temple, not to acknowledge their dependence on thanking the God who had
brought them out of Egypt, but to "get something out of religion": harmony, security,
prosperity, and peace. The priests and prophets took advantage of the revival of religious
interests but actually contributed to the prostitution of Israel. The priest eats from the sins that
people commit against Yahweh (7:7-10) (Anderson & Darr, 1957).
Hosea offered a strategic program of religious life to the Israelites to confront, stem, and
even conquer the devastating attack of the Canaani fertility cult by purification back to memory
in the wilderness. In the wilderness, the early Israelites once felt how the covenant bond
between God and His people provided happiness, protection, and security. God in the
wilderness is the one who gives all the sufficiency and gives fulfillment to all the needs of His
people. In the wilderness "The religion of Israel became ethical because it was the religion of
choice and not of nature, as it rested on voluntary decisions, which formed an ethical
relationship between the people and God for the whole time.
Sacrifice and Tribute in Hosea 6:6: The Implication of Contextual Worshipping
621 Interdisciplinary Social Studies, 1(5), Feb 2022
Hosea Contextualization Efforts
Hosea was the first prophet to dare to say that God not only knew and chose Israel but also
loved or loved her. He also presented the Lord with "the end of season rain" (which allows the
fruit to bloom. 6:3) and with "dew," (14:6, the only source of water in summer), even with a
"green sanobar tree" (14:9). These tropes are derived from the religion of fertility, but it is
precisely the prophet who fought the religion of fertility as hard as this uses the tropes
commonly used by the fertility religion to illustrate God's concerns in the religion of Israel.
This is where the process of contextualization of theology carried out by Hosea in the prophet's
efforts to restore Israel to its original position as God's people was formed. Hosea used extreme
imagery in god's announcement of salvation. Hosea's image, therefore, moved in the same
world in the thought of Baalism that influenced Israel. The power of God's saving deeds
described by the prophet's metaphor uses a term also used in the Canaanite fertility cult. Here
Hosea's theology develops openly in dialogue with myth as an extraordinary process in its
adaptation and polemic against Canaanite mythology (Barth & Claire, 2010).
Research on the picture of spousal relationships to describe Yahwe's relationship with His
people is not an essay of the concepts of fertility cult with sacred prostitution. The Kekhususan
of the Israelites as the chosen people is not found in any nation's cult. Klaus Koch viewed
Hosea’s hal based on the concept of the idea of a covenant (berit). Berit is understood in many
ways in Israel’s religious history. The prophet of Northern Israel, Hosea, understood it as a
bond similar to marriage. The image of God's love as the basis of the covenant is clearly stated
by Hosea (Klaus, 1989).
Hosea was very fanatical against the practice of Baalism, but in order to awaken the
Israelites who had been too far affected by Baalism Hosea also used the language and nature
of thinking of Baalism belief in theology. This model of news becomes an entry point to be
able to understand the contextualization problem carried out by Hosea. Understanding the
contextualization here about how Hosea in an effort to fight against the worship of Baal who
wants to replace the legitimate Israeli belief using the words used also by the daily life of the
peasant community at that time. Hosea's expected contextualization is in order to emphasize
God's love based on His covenant (2:18; 6:6; 10:12). To emphasize the knowledge of God, that
is the belief in the deeds of God in the past. And with that Hosea will return the people of Israel
to the state that should have been like the beginning in the wilderness (2:13; band. 12:10), then
there will be new hope. The faithful love of the people will be restored (2:15), they will know
God again (2:19). It is then that Israel will recognize that it was God who gave fertility and
prosperity and not Baal (2:7,20-21; band. 14:8-9). In order to understand the special
relationship that is typical of Israel, Hosea uses natural metaphors that exist around him and
are known by Israel.
Thus Hosea's utterances remain largely along the lines of the prophet's marriage story
centered on a relationship with God determined by faithful love expecting submission and
obedience. The land is seen as God's faithful wife and the people as his children. God has
shaped the history of salvation with fatherly hands. He had loved his son Israel since Egypt,
taught him to walk, and loved him (11:1-4). Hosea declares Israel's call as a rebuke (9,10). In
fact, he also used the term softener for Israel — and calf for Ephraim — as well as the term
wheat although this is a term often used by the worship of Baal (4.16; 10:11). The meadow is
also expressed by Hosea here, as a metaphor for God's provider (13:6; 4:16), as well as
Sacrifice and Tribute in Hosea 6:6: The Implication of Contextual Worshipping
622 Interdisciplinary Social Studies, 1(5), Feb 2022
deliverance from the shackles of strangers they have received (11.4). To Hosea Yahweh was
the giver of fertility and life. For Hosea, the Lord came and made rain (10:12), giving corn, oil,
wool, and also wine as gifts, a provider that went beyond what was directly necessary to
preserve life (2.2dst). And the Lord also showed himself in the midst of the storm and the wind
(13:15). Hosea's image moved in the same world as the Baalism that influenced Israel (Klaus,
1989).
According to Wolff, Hosea's theology with Canaanite cults and mythology provides a
basic example of contemporary faith dialogue with ideology. Hosea boldly used the words of
the myth, but behind that Hosea nevertheless expressed the dominant certainty that Jehovah
acting in the present and future was none other than God. The Lord who had begun covenant
history with Israel at his young age, the exodus from Egypt (2:15,17; 11:1; 13:4); by covenant
(1:9; 6:7; 8:1); and by the grace of the divine law (2:19, 21; 8:12;13:4 so on).
Hosea looked at the present and future of Israel together with its history. Israel's history is
thoroughly embedded in Hosea's statement. He saw the last decade of Isheael, when the king
was assassinated and the throne usurped (7:7; 8:4); during the last century, the evil of the Yehu
Dynasty in 844S AD (1:4); at the beginning of the kingdom under Saul, where he placed it at
the root of the present kingdom's transgressions (13:10 so on; 9:15). Beyond this, it again
reached more comprehensively for the period of conquest (2:8,10; 9:10; 10:11dst; 11:1dst;
13:5dst). For Hosea, the tradition of Conquest had to be separated either from the deliverance
from Egypt (2:15,17; 11:1; 10:13, 14; 13:4) or from the wilderness tradition (9:10; 13:5; 2:3,
5, 14, 16dst). The period of conquest saw Israel's early encounter with the cult of Baal (Ist.
Baal Peor, 9:10) thus the apostasy of Israel was already there and the Lord who had begun the
history of His salvation with him in Egypt and in the wilderness. Hosea's longest step back into
history led him to Jacob’s tradition (12:3-7,12,13). They primarily served to expose and expose
Israel's lies against God and others (Wolff, Hanson, & Stansell, 1974).
Israel's call, too, is determined by another metaphor: she is likened to a potentially trained
calf and responsible for the work of plowing by God (10:11). For Hosea, the word plowing,
sowing, and reaping is a metaphor that redefines the task of realizing God's design. The
formation of a nation is called by name and characterized by qualities that reflect His nature.
Here again, is a geographical and temporal relationship. From the wilderness Israel passed to
the land of Canaan, living a farming life (2:17) (Wolff et al., 1974).
CONCLUSION
Analysis of the ideas of the implementation and problems of worship in the Hosea era
produces theological themes that can be considered in the efforts of theological building
thinking contextualization of worship. For GKE Congregation who will carry out, follow and
use ethnic worship in GKE can have theological guidelines. So the theological themes of Hosea
worship are faithful love, the knowledge of God, the relationship built with others and rulers
(Raja), plus also to the universe. According to Hosea, Israel required God to keep the covenant
and be responsible for restoring it and repenting in the event of deviation. Likewise in Dayak
Ngaju culture, humans with the predicate of Crisp man and Tingang man appear as
environmental stewards. As a living environmental administrator (Bukan ruler) with
mechanical 'not yet bahadat,' which is taken care of by humans including elements of flora,
Sacrifice and Tribute in Hosea 6:6: The Implication of Contextual Worshipping
623 Interdisciplinary Social Studies, 1(5), Feb 2022
fauna, fellow humans, spirits, and supernatural spirits, it is necessary to maintain a good
relationship with God.
REFERENCES
Anderson, Bernhard W., & Darr, Katheryn Pfisterer. (1957). Understanding the old testament.
Baker, Warren, & Carpenter, Eugene E. (2003). The complete word study dictionary: Old
Testament. AMG Publishers.
Barth, Christoph, & Claire, Marie. (2010). Teologi Perjanjian Lama 1. BPK Gunung Mulia.
Beeby, H. Dan. (1989). Grace abounding: a commentary on the Book of Hosea. Wm. B.
Eerdmans Publishing.
Calvin, John. (2013). Calvin’s Complete Commentary on the Bible. Delmarva Publications,
Inc.
Hubbard, David Allan. (2009). Hosea: An introduction and commentary (Tyndale old
testament commentaries) (Vol. 24). Nottingham: Inter-Varsity Press.
Klaus, Koch. (1989). The Prophets: Volume One—The Assyrian Period.
Lange, John Peter. (1884). Commentary on the Holy Scriptures (Vol. 16). Scribner.
Limburg, James. (2011). Hosea--Micah. Westminster John Knox Press.
Ogilvie, Lloyd J. (2004). The Preacher’s Commentary-Vol. 22:
Hosea/Joel/Amos/Obadiah/Jonah. Thomas Nelson.
Preuss, Horst Dietrich. (1996). Old Testament Theology, Volume II: A Commentary.
Westminster John Knox Press.
Strong, James. (1996). The New Strong’s dictionary of Hebrew and Greek words. CD-ROM.
Nashville, TN: Thomas Nelson Publishers.
Swanson, James. (1997). Dictionary of Biblical Languages with Semantic Domains: Greek
(New Testament)(electronic ed.). Oak Harbor: Logos Research Systems. Inc.
Wolff, Hans Walter, Hanson, Paul D., & Stansell, Gary. (1974). Hosea: a commentary on the
book of the prophet Hosea. Augsburg Fortress Publishers.