The USA’s Shale Oil Revolution: OPEC Strategies and Oil Prices War in Global Economy
830 Interdisciplinary Social Studies, 1(7), Apr 2022
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
International Regimes
The international regime is something that underlies all institutions and organizations in
international entities. Stephen D. Krasner's book entitled, "International Regimes" explains that
international regimes are a group of principles, rules, and norms in implicit or explicit decision-
making to regulate the behavior of actors and norms of international relations (Marc A. Levy,
Young, & Zürn, 1995). In this case, the international regime also facilitates the formation of an
agreement. This agreement can be made with international organizations, individual actors, to
state actors. while J. Samuel Barkin in his book entitled "International Organization: Theories
and Institutions" is more directed at actor expectations by analyzing the influence that
international organizations have on other actors. One of these expectations can come from an
agreement facilitated by the international regime itself.
Various elements of the consensus explain several things about the regime as a social
institution. The international regime characterizes the institutional structure of the wider
international community. Regime analysis is one of the tools to understand international
cooperation. In this case, cooperation is analyzed in terms of norms and the routine behavior
of patterned actors. In this case, if a collaboration is not under a regime or institution, the
activity cannot be considered as cooperation (N. C. Levy, 2005). The international regime
regulates the interaction of actors in certain areas with the number and types of different actors
participating. The principles from one regime to another are also different. State actors also
have a fairly broad role in shaping international agendas that can focus attention on specific
issues. The regime is also concerned with compliance aspects, this creates substantial success
for the regime. In fact, in some cases, the state mobilized the military and politics to make it
obedient to the international regime.
Regimes often distribute resources on special issues related to members of an institution.
This also has implications for the distribution of the capacity of each member country in an
international institution. Regimes can influence by redefining objectives in policy as this leads
directly to the development of a country. This requires a direct role from the state involved in
an institution because the international regime is impossible if the actors under it do not
implement the regime. The magnitude of the consequences received by the state regarding the
regime depends on the ability of the institution to solve problems. Each institution and the
structure within it plays a role in being able to show the effectiveness and superiority of each
of the rules in the institution. Concerning the international regime, OPEC has a set of rules to
regulate international oil prices even though the journey is often experiencing challenges.
OPEC also opened a regulation to cut subsidies due to a transfer of the petroleum market share
to the shale oil industry. OPEC creates regulations and protection policies for the oil ministers
of OPEC member countries. This effort was made to protect the management of each country's
oil market in adjusting to changes in the energy market share due to the presence of shale oil.
OPEC cannot create an international regime for non-OPEC member countries. If possible, non-
OPEC member countries would not comply. The international regime is weak outside of
international institutions. Meanwhile, countries that develop shale oil are non-OPEC member
countries. So in this case OPEC can only provide protection policies to member countries to
balance the market between crude oil and natural gas along with shale oil.