P-ISSN: 2808-0467
E-ISSN: 2808-5051
Homepage: https://iss.internationaljournallabs.com/index.php/iss
131 This work is licensed under CC BY-SA 4.0
THE EFFECTIVENESS OF HERO TRAINING TO IMPROVE THE
ENGAGEMENT OF DISASTER VOLUNTEERS
Neka Erlyani
*
, Rika Vira Zwagery, Marina Dwi Mayangsari
Lambung Mangkurat University, Indonesia
*
ARTICLE INFO ABSTRACT
Received:
October 2021
Revised:
November 2021
Approved:
November 2021
Background: The future development of CCeU ULM needs to consider the
nature of volunteers who do not want to continue to be in the organization.
Therefore, retaining volunteers to continue to be actively involved and
contribute to the organization is a challenge in itself.
Aim: This study aims to empirically test the "HERO" training (Hope,
Efficacy, Resiliency, Optimism) to increase the engagement of disaster
volunteers.
Method: The instrument used to measure psychological capital is adapted
from Cetin and Basim (2012), namely Psychological Capital Scale (R=
0.941). The scale used to measure the Work Engagement of Crisis Center
Unit ULM volunteers was (R= 0.935). The respondents of this study were 53
members of the ULM Crisis Center Unit, divided into men and women, with
criteria for 18-25 years. This research is a quasi-experimental study with a
non-randomized one-group pre-test post-test design.
Findings: Statistical analysis showed 0.699 >, 0.699 < 0.05, so it can
conclude that there is no significant effect of HERO training on the work
engagement of CCU FK ULM members. It means that other antecedents can
lead to one's work engagement.
KEYWORDS
HERO Training, Psychological Capital, Work Engagement
INTRODUCTION
Almost 70% of the disasters in Indonesia are hydrometeorological disasters, such as floods
due to weather changes. Hydrometeorological disasters are increasing every year in line with
the impact of global climate change and environmental degradation, especially floods
(Prawesthi, 2013). South Kalimantan is one of the provinces in Indonesia, which is a province
with a high risk of flooding in terms of its physical condition. Physical conditions in South
Kalimantan are mostly inundating during high rainfall. Geographically, most of South
Kalimantan is below sea level causing the water flow on the land surface to be less smooth
(BNPB). Quoted from detik.com, the South Kalimantan flash flood in mid-January 2021 was
the enormous flood in history that hit ten city districts, causing 15 people to die, 66,768 houses
were submerged, 18,294 meters of roads were submerging, and 21 bridges were damaged. This
flood caused 18,356 hectares of agricultural land in 11 districts/cities in Kalimantan to fail to
harvest and caused 39,549 thousand residents to evacuate (National Disaster Management
Agency, 2021). The victims who died from the flood came from Tanah Laut Regency 7 people,
Hulu Sungai Tengah Regency 3 people, Banjar Baru City 1 person, Tapin Regency 1 person,
and Banjar Regency 3 people.
The South Kalimantan flood disaster caused infrastructure damage and economic
problems, fulfilling clothing, food, physical and mental health for both the survivors and the
families of the deceased. To help solve these problems, Lambung Mangkurat University, as
The Effectiveness of HERO Training to Improve the Engagement of Disaster Volunteers
132 Interdisciplinary Social Studies, 1(2), November 2021
one of the largest universities in Kalimantan, demonstrated its role in society by establishing a
disaster management unit known as the Crisis Center Unit (CCeU) ULM. Some of the goals of
establishing CCeU are as an official ULM institution that will respond to any disasters that
occur locally or nationally, protect ULM students interested in volunteering, and act as
recipients and distributors of aid, both in the form of goods and money.
ULM has potential human resources with various scientific backgrounds that the
community needs when a disaster occurs, such as health and medicine, agriculture, forestry,
animal husbandry, physical structure and infrastructure, social, psychology, and technology.
The Crisis Center Unit ULM (CCeU) is an institution consisting of a team of volunteers who
will provide disaster management responses at every stage of disaster management. The Health
Service Team is led and implemented by the ULM Faculty of Medicine and the Hospital
Network. CCeU ULM carried out Health and Psychological services for refugees during the
Flood Disaster.
A volunteer voluntarily (Uncoerced) donates his time, energy, thoughts, and expertise to
help others and is aware that they will not get wages or salaries from the donation. Volunteering
is an activity that all levels of society can carry out as a form of concern and commitment to a
particular vision (Savutri, 2005). Slamet (2009) stated that volunteers are people without being
paid, provide their time to achieve organizational goals, with significant or limited
responsibilities, without or with little special training, but can be with very intensive training
in specific fields, to work voluntarily to help workers.
Previous research on work engagement was conduct in paid work settings (Bakker &
Leiter, 2010). However, volunteers are still under-appreciated in other ways and do not get paid
(Vecina et al., 2012); one of them is a volunteer. The attachment that exists on volunteers is
related to how volunteers carry out their roles and significantly impact the organization's
operations. Research on work engagement of volunteers is essential because volunteers do not
receive economic remuneration, even though they give their time, effort, and sometimes
materials to the organization (Vecina et al., 2012). Volunteers engaged will dedicate their time,
and they will feel satisfaction (Jenkinson et al., 2013) and well-being (J. Y. Huynh et al., 2014).
In addition, it will also have a positive impact on the organization namely volunteers will stay
in the organization (J.-Y. Huynh et al., 2012). Volunteers engaged in their role will feel satisfied
with their experience and have low intention to leave the organization (J. Y. Huynh et al.,
2014).
Several previous studies have proved that several psychological constructs influence work
engagement in the dimensions of psychological capital, such as self-efficacy, resilience,
optimism, and hope (Bakker & Leiter, 2010). Based on several studies on the factors that affect
work engagement as shown, it can conclude that the psychological aspect of the individual is
an influential factor for the emergence of work engagement. One of them is psychological
capital.
Psychological capital interpreted as an individual's psychological capacity develops with
self-efficacy, optimism, hope, and resilience (Lee & Yang, 2019). Psychological capital
consists of four psychological capacities: hope, self-efficacy, resilience, and optimism,
abbreviated as HERO. Psychological capital defines as a positive psychological development
in individuals (Luthans et al., 2010). Luthans, Avolio, Avey, and Norman (LUTHANS et al.,
2007) explain that psychological capital utilizes an individual's positive psychological
The Effectiveness of HERO Training to Improve the Engagement of Disaster Volunteers
133 Interdisciplinary Social Studies, 1(2), November 2021
potential. It is helpful to develop the potential of living life, which is determining by the ability
to solve problems (Self-efficacy), positive expectations about the future (Optimism), diligently
hoping for success (Hope), and being able to rise and face problems (Resilience) to achieve
success.
Through psychological capital, volunteers will receive education on building hope, setting
goals, and building feelings of optimism and confidence. Optimistic feelings can lead
individuals to view life positively. Optimistic individuals will be able to interpret life now as
something that can support their life goals.
The future development of CCeU ULM needs to consider the nature of volunteers who do
not want to continue to be in the organization. Therefore, retaining volunteers to continue to be
actively involved and contribute to the organization is a challenge in itself. Starting from these
problems, researchers are interested in empirically testing the effectiveness of HERO training
to increase the engagement of disaster volunteers.
METHOD
The research method used a quasi-experiment with a non-randomized one-group pre-test
post-test design. The design was chosen with the consideration that this study did not allow
randomization to divide participants into the experimental group and the control group (Seniati
et al., 2005).
The training was held on August 14 and 15 through Zoom Meeting with student volunteers
at CCeU ULM. The scale was distributed to participants before and after the training activities
were given. The population of this study was all student volunteers of the ULM Crisis Center
Unit, as many as 206 people. The selection of research subjects used simple random sampling
with 100 people for trials and 100 people for research subjects. Individual criteria that can be
involved in this research are: 1) Undergraduate students who are active members of the ULM
Crisis Center Unit, 2) Willing to participate in all HERO training in total, and 3) Willing to fill
out informed consent as written evidence of willingness to be involved in research.
This study collects the data by work engagement scale and psychological capital scale, the
worksheets' results, and the evaluation results. The work engagement scale uses The Utrecht
Work Engagement Scale (UWES) in a more concise version developed by Schaufeli et al.
(2006a) and consists of 9 items. The level of psychological capital is measured using the
psychological capital scale (Cetin & Basim, 2012). This scale in the form of a Likert is the
result of translation and analysis of the psychological capital scale belonging to Luthans et al.
(Luthans et al., 2007), consisting of 24 items.
Quantitative data analysis conducted in this study were assumption test, description test,
regression test, and hypothesis testing. The assumption test includes normality and linearity
tests. Test the description to get an overview of the research dataa regression test to
determine the contribution of training in influencing work engagement. Meanwhile, hypothesis
testing using different tests to determine the effectiveness of HERO training in increasing the
work engagement of training participantsdata analysis using SPSS Version 22.0.
The Effectiveness of HERO Training to Improve the Engagement of Disaster Volunteers
134 Interdisciplinary Social Studies, 1(2), November 2021
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
The training was held on August 14 and 15 through Zoom Meeting with student volunteers
at CCeU ULM. The scale was distributed to participants before and after the training activities
were given.
Tabel 1.1 Statistical Data Var. Psychological Capital
Paired Samples Statistics
Mean
N
Std.
Error
Mean
Pair 1
Pre
Test
104,6038
53
1,64796
Postest
109,9057
53
1,81636
In this data analysis, there is a relationship between Pretest and Posttest Var. Psychological
Capital Sig<0.05
Table 1.2 Paired Samples Correlations
In this data, there is a significant effect between the pre-test and post-test Var.
Psychological Capital because Sig. 2 Tailed < 0.05 that is 0.001.
Table 1.3 Paired Samples Test
Paired Differences
t
df
Sig. (2-
tailed)
Mean
Std.
Deviati
on
Std.
Error
Mean
95%
Confidence
Interval of the
Difference
Lower
Upper
Pair
1
Pre
Test -
Postest
-5,301
10,757
1,477
-8,266
-2,336
-3,588
52
,001
Table 1.4 Descriptive Statistics Var. Job Engagement in the statistical paired sample table
Paired Samples Statistics
Mean
N
Std.
Deviation
Std.
Error
Mean
Pair
1
Pre
Test
127,962
53
11,959
1,642
Paired Samples Correlations
N
Correlation
Sig.
Pair 1
Pre Test &
Postest
53
,640
,000
The Effectiveness of HERO Training to Improve the Engagement of Disaster Volunteers
135 Interdisciplinary Social Studies, 1(2), November 2021
Post
Test
128,377
53
13,025
1,789
In this data analysis, there is a relationship between Pretest and Posttest Var. Work
Engagement Sig <0.05
Tabel 1.5 Paired Sample Correlations
Paired Samples Correlations
N
Correlation
Sig.
Pair 1
Pre Test & Post Test
53
,810
,000
In this data, there is no significant effect between the pre-test and post-test Var. Work
engagement due to Sig. 2 Tailed > 0.05, which is 0.699.
Table 1.6 Paired Samples Test
Paired Differences
t
df
Sig. (2-
tailed)
Mean
Std.
Deviation
Std.
Error
Mean
95%
Confidence
Interval of the
Difference
Lower
Upper
Pair 1
Pre
Test -
Post
Test
-,41509
7,774
1,067
-2,557
1,727
-,389
52
,699
HERO training was successfully held by 53 participants from the Crisis Center Unit (CCU)
of Lambung Mangkurat University. The research design used was a quasi-experimental design
with a non-randomized one-group post-test design. The results obtained from the HERO
training show a significant effect on knowledge of psychological capital. These results can see
in Table 1.1 in the paired sample. Statistically, the table shows an increase in the average value
before and after treatment, namely the average pre-test value (M = 104.6038) while the average
value post-test (M = 109.9057). Then in table 1.2, paired sample correlations show that 0.001
<, i.e., 0.001 < 0.05, meaning that there is a significant effect between the pre-test and post-test
of psychological capital variables after being given HERO training. These findings are in line
with the research of Wijaya (Wijaya, 2021), which also carries the concept of psychological
capital training to increase work engagement. The training in research conducted by Wijaya
(Wijaya, 2021) showed an increase in knowledge of the psychological capital of coffee
restaurant employees after being given training.
Meanwhile, the pre-test and post-test work engagement results did not show any
significant effect from the HERO training, and we can see it from table 1.6, namely the table
paired sample test. Statistical analysis showed 0.699 >, 0.699 < 0.05, so it can be concluded
that there is no significant effect of HERO training on the work engagement of CCU FK ULM
The Effectiveness of HERO Training to Improve the Engagement of Disaster Volunteers
136 Interdisciplinary Social Studies, 1(2), November 2021
members. These findings are not in line with the hypothesis offered by the researcher at the
beginning that HERO training can increase the work engagement of CCU FK ULM members.
According to Schaufeli & Bakker (Schaufeli et al., 2006), the attenuation of work engagement
does not only come from psychological capital. Another factor affecting work engagement is
the JD-R model (Job demand-resources model) or workload model consisting of aspects of the
physical, social and organizational environment, salary, career opportunities, supervisor and
co-workers support, and performance feedback. It means that other antecedents can lead to
one's work engagement. In this study, the researcher only focused on the psychological capital
of the participants as an attenuator of work engagement. Meanwhile, external factors contained
in the JD-R or workload, such as the physical environment, support from supervisors, co-
workers, and performance feedback, escaped the observations of researchers, which should
have been taken into consideration by researchers.
The explanation in the previous paragraph has answered the problem formulation in this
study, namely that HERO training did not significantly affect the work engagement of CCU
FK ULM members. The results of this study are in line with research by Indrianti & Hadi
(2012) with a study entitled "The Relationship between Psychological Capital and Work
Attachment to Nurses at the Inpatient Installation of Menur Mental Hospital Surabaya." The
results of this study did not indicate the influence of psychological capital on the work
engagement of nurses at Menur Mental Hospital Surabaya. So, the results of the research
obtained are a reflection of the researchers so that they consider other factors that exist in the
research participants.
CONCLUSION
Based on the results, we figure out a significant effect between the pre-test and post-test
of the Psychological Capital Variable. We figure out that there is no effect between the pre-test
and post-test of the Job Engagement Variable. It can be caused by other factors that the
researcher does not measure so that this can be considered for further researchers to examine
more deeply related to the same variable.
Suggestions that can be given to volunteers are expected to have a strong work attachment
to volunteer behavior by developing factors that can affect the increase in volunteerism both
from the physical, social and organizational aspects. It is also hoped that volunteers can apply
hope and efficacy that is strong and capable of being resilient and optimistic in daily activities.
REFERENCES
Bakker, A. B., & Leiter, M. P. (2010). Work engagement: A handbook of essential theory and
research. Psychology Press.
Huynh, J.-Y., Winefield, A. H., Xanthopoulou, D., & Metzer, J. C. (2012). Burnout and
Connectedness in the Job DemandsResources Model. American Journal of Hospice and
Palliative Medicine®, 29(6). https://doi.org/10.1177/1049909111430224
Huynh, J. Y., Xanthopoulou, D., & Winefield, A. H. (2014). The Job Demands-Resources
Model in emergency service volunteers: Examining the mediating roles of exhaustion,
work engagement and organizational connectedness. Work & Stress, 28(3).
https://doi.org/10.1080/02678373.2014.936922
The Effectiveness of HERO Training to Improve the Engagement of Disaster Volunteers
137 Interdisciplinary Social Studies, 1(2), November 2021
Indrianti, R., & Hadi, C. (2012). Hubungan antara modal psikologis dengan keterikatan kerja
pada perawat di instalasi rawat inap Rumah Sakit Jiwa Menur Surabaya. Jurnal Psikologi
Industri Dan Organisasi, 1(2).
Lee, Y.-L., & Yang, D.-J. (2019). Potential Contributions of Psychological Capital to the
Research Field of Marketing. Frontiers in Psychology, 10.
https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.02111
Luthans, F., Avey, J. B., Avolio, B. J., & Peterson, S. J. (2010). The development and resulting
performance impact of positive psychological capital. Human Resource Development
Quarterly, 21(1). https://doi.org/10.1002/hrdq.20034
LUTHANS, F., AVOLIO, B. J., AVEY, J. B., & NORMAN, S. M. (2007). POSITIVE
PSYCHOLOGICAL CAPITAL: MEASUREMENT AND RELATIONSHIP WITH
PERFORMANCE AND SATISFACTION. Personnel Psychology, 60(3).
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-6570.2007.00083.x
Luthans, F., Youssef, M., & Carolyn, A. J. B. (2007). Psychological capital: Developing the
human competitive edge. Oxford University Press.
Prawesthi, A. D. (2013). Optimalisasi potensi lokal di kawasan rawan banjir dalam
perencanaan tempat evakuasi sementara (TES).
Savutri, G. N. (2005). Panduan manajemen kerelawanan. Piramedia.
Schaufeli, W. B., Bakker, A. B., & Salanova, M. (2006). The Measurement of Work
Engagement With a Short Questionnaire. Educational and Psychological Measurement,
66(4). https://doi.org/10.1177/0013164405282471
Seniati, L., Yulianto, A., Setiadi, B. N., & Darwin, S. (2005). Psikologi eksperimen. Indeks.
Vecina, M. L., Chacón, F., Sueiro, M., & Barrón, A. (2012). Volunteer Engagement: Does
Engagement Predict the Degree of Satisfaction among New Volunteers and the
Commitment of Those who have been Active Longer? Applied Psychology, 61(1).
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1464-0597.2011.00460.x
Wijaya, A. (2021). Efektivitas pelatihan modal psikologis terhadap keterikatan kerja pegawai
Resto Kopi X Salatiga. Jurnal Syntax Admiration, 2(3).