P-ISSN: 2808-0467
E-ISSN: 2808-5051
Homepage: https://iss.internationaljournallabs.com/index.php/iss
1617
BORDER INSECURITY AND THE CHALLENGES OF
TRANSNATIONAL TERRORISM IN NORTH EAST NIGERIA
Ishaku Hamidu
Department of Political Science, Federal University of Kashere, P.M.B 0182 Gombe, Gombe State, Nigeria
ishakuhamidu1041@fukashere.edu.ng
PAPER INFO ABSTRACT
Received:
November 2022
Revised:
November 2022
Approved:
November 2022
Background: Using secondary sources of data, and adopting
transnationalism theory, it is discovered that Nigeria’s territory and
population are vulnerable. Consequently, the border towns and its people
become prey to transnational terrorists’ organizations; drug barons;
smugglers; among others. Some frontline settlers are conscripted into or give
support to the criminal elements; engage in illegal smuggling, thereby
making the state lose vital revenue from some traders and corrupt state
officials at the border posts.
Aim: The study looked at some of the literature on border security and
insecurity, terrorism on both a domestic and international scale, the effects of
porous border security on people's lives, property, and socioeconomic
activities, and the implications for those living in the border region of
northeastern Nigeria.
Method: Articles from magazines, newspapers, textbooks, and other
resources were compiled. The many authors' viewpoints and contents are
studied or addressed in the sections that follow.
Findings: Border insecurity is the factor responsible for the inability of the
states to halt the terrorists’ activities across Nigerian international boundary
in the north-east axis. Government is therefore urged to establish its authority
in those frontline states; equip the nation’s security operatives; boost cross-
border security surveillances; provide social infrastructures for those at the
border to make them patriotic and loyal to the state as the panacea for halting
trans-border criminality and terrorism in the North-East in particular and
Nigeria at large.
KEYWORDS
north-east, trans-border, transnational terrorism, insecurity
© The author(s). This work is distributed under the terms of the Creative
Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License (CC BY-SA 4.0)
INTRODUCTION
Security of lives and properties is one of the vital functions of Government. Government
of states uses its operatives to ensure the security of its territory and citizens. It is because poor
management of borders can cause internal and external insecurity that may affects
sociopolitical and economic activities or development in the country (Ewetan & Urhie, 2014).
The aforementioned information seems to be lacking in Nigeria in recent times as evidenced
in the frequent cases of terrorist attacks, kidnapping for ransom, herders-farmers conflicts,
smuggling of goods and services, human trafficking, etc.
The quest to undercover the rational for these and its effects on the states are the major
triggers/aims of this study. The paper therefore examined some literatures on border security
and insecurity, terrorism at both domestic and transnational levels, effects of porous border
security on the lives, properties and socioeconomic activities and the implications on the people
of North-eastern Nigeria border paradigm.
Border Insecurity and the Challenges of Transnational Terrorism in North East Nigeria
1618 Interdisciplinary Social Studies, 2(2), Nov 2022
Border Security and Insecurity
According to Iheanacho and Ohazurike (2019), border security involves defending any
state against unlawful cross-border operations such as the importation of illegal goods such as
drugs, weapons, and ammunition. Corroborating with the above, Nelson et al. (2010), noted
that “the managing of the flow of people, goods and other tangible items across national
boundaries” is what border security connote.
Border Insecurity on the other hand is the failure, laxity or inability of the state or
government to be in full control of the movement of goods and services in and across its
legitimate borders (Agbedahin, 2014). This makes the people, territory and the economy of the
state vulnerable to exploitation. According to Wikipedia (2016), insecurity means threat to the
general peace of the people which may later be considered as low level of disorder, large-scale
violence, or even an armed insurgency (like that of Boko Haram and others for example).
North-East Nigeria
North-East is geopolitical zone in Nigeria. Wikipedia Encyclopedia, however, elaborates
that one of Nigeria's administrative regions known as the North Eastern State is the North East
geopolitical zone. On May 27
th
, 1967, it was formed from the Northern area. It had Maiduguri
as its capital. The North Eastern state was separated into Bauchi, Borno, and Gongola on
February 3rd, 1976. Six further states were created from these three. For instance, the former
Borno State was split into the present-day states of Borno and Yobe on August 27, 1991. The
former Gongola State was split into Adamawa State and Taraba State on the same day as well.
In October 1996, the former Bauchi State was split into the current Bauchi State and the Gombe
State. Before the states of today were created
Trans-Border Crimes/Transnational Terrorism
The task of defining trans-border crime and transnational terrorism would not be an easy
one, because many elements have been recognized as constituting it. However, according to
Ering (2011), transnational and international criminal activity that crosses boundaries is
referred to as trans-border crime. These criminal actions are often carried out for monetary
gain, socio-political gain, or religious motivations. It is a collection of crimes whose
perpetrators and effects transcend national boundaries. These would include, but are not limited
to, cross-border terrorism, drug trafficking, illegal oil bunkering, illegal diamond trafficking,
money laundering, human trafficking, drug and alcohol trafficking, illegal drug sales, and
trafficking in firearms.
According to Williams (2012), transnational crime undermines and undermines the body
politics' inherent defenses, acting as the HIV virus of the modern state. Williams claimed that
most states had the ability to contain this threat in the past, but this is no longer clearly the case.
This means trans-border crime is not a new phenomenon. Collaborating with the above,
according to Moulaye (2009), trans-border crime is a group of criminal activities whose
perpetrators and effects transcend national boundaries. Because of the manner that natural
resources were managed and how rebellions and civil wars were handled, this type of crime
first emerged in the 1990s, when political turbulence, hot spots, and intercommunal conflicts
increased throughout a number of nations. A situation like this gradually ruined relationships
Border Insecurity and the Challenges of Transnational Terrorism in North East Nigeria
1619 Interdisciplinary Social Studies, 2(2), Nov 2022
between neighbors, made poverty worse, and provided opportunities for criminal groups to
form cross-border or even multinational networks.
From discourse above, one can say that transnational or trans-border crime is the illegal
cross border activities in terms of transporting of goods and services by both nationalities and
aliens of one country to another. Trans-border crime is most often the work of networked gangs
of traffickers that receive at times support locally and from well-structured sources across
countries (Ellis & Akpala, 2011). International Terrorism is the terrorist attacks that affect
people of one or more countries (Böhmelt et al., 2020), like the Boko Haram attack on the
United Nations Building in Abuja; or hostage taking that involves other nationalities.
Transnational terrorism is the organizing of terrorist activities in one country and executing it
in another; or a terrorist group in country ‘A’ being connected to another terrorist group in
country ‘B’; and these two or more collaborating together to carry out attacks or support each
other with ideas, weapons, recruiting of personnel or sending of finances. Boko Haram from
North-East Nigeria has graduated from mere domestic to an international terrorist group as she
relates with Islamic State of Iran and Levant (ISIL) which gave her the power to operate as
Islamic State in West Africa Province (ISWAP), in spite of some internal challenges.
Theoretical Framework
Randolph Bourne popularized the transnationalism thesis in the early 20
th
century as a
result of the growing interconnectedness of people and the diminishing economic and social
significance of national boundaries (Wikipedia, 2016). This theory viewed that the increased
interaction between non-state actors across the borders has led to several impact on the
capability of states. This transnational interaction can take place in one country while the
effects are seen in another country as Soehl and Waldinger (2012) observed.
With the idea of diaspora at the forefront, racial dynamics underlying the global division
of labor, and the financial turmoil of global capital, this approach highlights the ways in which
nations are no longer able to contain or control the dispute or negotiation through which social
groups annex a global dimension to their meaningful practices (Wikipedia, 2016). This theory
according to Iheanacho and Ohazurike (2019) is appropriate in studying and understanding
cross border interactions and activities between states and non-state actors and even among
other salient actors. The theory is used in this study because it helps to explain how and why
people connect within and across the northern borders of Nigeria and engage in unlawful
activity and trade that the government finds challenging to put an end to.
METHOD
The work used secondary sources of data. Articles from news papers, journal, text books
and internet materials were collated. The contents or views of the various authors are analyzed
or discussed thematically below.
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
Nigerian Border Paradigm and Its Security
Nigeria which was colonized by Britain was granted political independence on October,
1
st
, 1960. It shares large international boundary with some ex-France colonies. The
international boundary between the Republic of Nigeria and Republic of Benin is about 773
Border Insecurity and the Challenges of Transnational Terrorism in North East Nigeria
1620 Interdisciplinary Social Studies, 2(2), Nov 2022
kilometers; Nigeria and Cameroon boundary span about 1,690 kilometers; Nigeria/Chad border
is 85 kilometers through the Lake Chad; Nigeria share 1,497 kilometer border with Niger and
then with Guinea on the coastal areas (Mbah, 2012; Umara, 2014; Yenwong-Fai, 2012). These
Nigerian neighbours also share international boundaries with other countries that serve as gate
way to Europe. For example, Chad is strategically located between North Africa, East Africa
and Central Africa where there had been extreme religious and political tension (Mbah, 2012;
Yenwong-Fai, 2012).
Along their common borders, Nigeria and her neighbours share lot of socio-economic
activities, cross cultural, educational, medical facilities and other bilateral agreements and
relations both at official and unofficial levels. For instance, Nigeria and Chad are in the Lake
Chad Basin Commission and the Coast of Guinea Commission, among others (Mbah, 2012).
The Nigerian state like others is to man and manage its border for maximum security of
lives and properties; ensures that trans-border trading is well accounted for as a source of
foreign exchange/revenue for the nation; to check and halt illegal weapons, contraband goods
from in or out of the country. The Government is to make sure the lives and economy of its
citizens at the borders is well protected as well as the welfare of the frontline settler’s are
catered for. In view of the imperatives above, Nigeria have military and paramilitary
organizations that are trained and paid to man those entry and exit routes in the border towns.
The Nigeria Custom and Immigrations services and others are at the borders of the North-East.
The Military (Army, Air force and Navy) also monitor activities in and across the border for
national security and development (Hamidu, 2017).
Border Insecurity and the Challenges of Transnational Terrorism in North Eastern
Nigeria
Border insecurity and lack of development of border town settlements, provision of
infrastructures and other social amenities etc in Nigerian frontline states has directly and
indirectly affected the Northeastern states of Nigeria. Ekpenyong (1993) argued that most of
Nigerian frontline towns and states are not well secured. He stressed that alien comes in and
go unhindered and without records which posed security threat to the nation’s security and
socioeconomic development. He opined that unscrupulous elements either from any of the
neighbouring countries or nationals of other remote countries and continents use the same
border for illegal or shabby businesses such as smuggling of contraband goods and other
dangerous substances or chemicals; arms and ammunitions; trafficking in persons etc. which
can affect both national, sub-regional and even continental peace, security and development.
Corroborating with the above, Mailabari and Hamidu (2015) also noted that most frontline
states and border town settlements in Nigeria are not developed and secured when compared
to other parts of the settlements in the interior. Such insecurities have therefore led to or caused
several unfortunate incidences such as:
1) Starting and Boosting of Insurgency/Terrorism: Border Insecurity facilitates
radicalization of youths in the Northeast of the country. For instance, Boko Haram that
started in Nigeria as a normal Islamic school in the city of Maiduguri with some of its
students from across the nation’s borders later became a radicalized insurgency group
from 2009 following the group’s clashes with the military. In 2019, it is obvious that
Boko Haram has become a transnational terrorist organization operating beyond the
Border Insecurity and the Challenges of Transnational Terrorism in North East Nigeria
1621 Interdisciplinary Social Studies, 2(2), Nov 2022
shores of Nigeria under the name Islamic State in West African Province (ISWAP).
The terrorists also exploit such border insecurity as opportunities to recruit, camp,
radicalize youths both within and across, and execute their plans against their
enemies/targets. For instance, the group’s strong grip of the Sambisa forest and the
Lake Chad basin axis, gives them access to weapons, personnel and income that keeps
the group going. Al-Qaeda in the Islamic Maghreb (AQIM) has been moving through
the Sahel towards Mali, Mauritania, and Niger. Indeed, there are indications that AQIM
has operational bases in some West Africa countries and has forged tactical alliances
with terrorists groups such as Boko Haram in Nigeria, the Movement for Oneness and
Jihad in West Africa (MUJAO), the National Movement for the Liberation of Azawad
(NMLA) and Ansar Eddine in Mali and Niger. These alliances have taken the form of
AQIM’s provision of training and logical supports to the Boko Haram and other
terrorist operatives. Yenwong-Fai (2012) claimed that the militant movement Boko
Haram, which has its roots in Nigeria, poses a monumental danger to Nigeria’s
neighbours since its influence spread across the Nigerian borders. The abundance of
permeable borders in the West African Sub Region greatly increases the risks posed by
this violent group. Target nations include Chad, Benin, Cameroon, and Niger because
of their proximity to Nigeria, demographics, and socioeconomic ties. These borders'
openness makes it easier for terrorist activity to spread to nearby nations and beyond;
given the relative ease with which terrorist elements can or do cross in and out of those
neighbouring countries. It should be noted that citizens of Cameroon and Niger have
been suspected of participating in militants and terrorist activities as far back as the
1980s during the reigns of Maita-tsine, and now in the era of the Boko Haram in Nigeria
(Taiwo, 2010). This alleged involvement implies that terrorist activities could and has
already spread across Nigerian borders and infiltrated the neighbouring countries such
as training recruits, planning and execution of terrorist acts. They are also using the
neighbouring states as safe havens. Allegations that some Boko Haram migrated to
Niger and Cameroon after committing attacks in the northern part of Nigeria buttress
the need for swift actions in addressing the problems of trans-border terrorism in
Nigeria (Bashir, 2013).
2) Proliferation of Arms: Border insecurity in North-eastern Nigeria aid smuggling of
weapons in the country. Small Arms and Light Weapons (SALW) pipelines will
continue to exist and the likelihood of effective border management, patrol, and
promotion will be severely hampered as long as the northern Nigerian borders are open
and ineffectively manned by reasonable security officers. According to Krause (2007),
three mechanisms are involved in the illicit trade in weapons: the black markets, covert
government-to-government transactions, and sub-state group sponsorship. While
private aid from arms dealers or charitable interest organizations is not unusual, this
last type typically depends on favorable support from a foreign government. It is clear
that the proliferation of Small Arms and Light Weapons (SALW) is in part, a response
to demand for personal security when normative social relations collapse or are seen to
be on the brink of collapse. Krause (2007) claimed that in parts of West Africa and
North-eastern Nigeria in particular, the absence of functional and caring governments
has led to the spread of lawlessness and criminal violence. In response, Musah (2002)
Border Insecurity and the Challenges of Transnational Terrorism in North East Nigeria
1622 Interdisciplinary Social Studies, 2(2), Nov 2022
stated that many parts of Nigeria are increasingly militarized. Militarization includes
the presence of heavily armed checked points along roads. He stated that in Africa, the
sources of Small Arms and Light Weapons (SALW) proliferation are many and varied.
While the focus of international efforts to reduce proliferation frequently centers on the
production and supply of new weapons, a significant source of SALW continues to be
the stockpiles that the former Soviet Union, the United States, and their allies pumped
into Africa in the 1970s and 1980s to fuel or finance proxy interstate wars. Small Arms
and Light Weapons apologists of this postulation claimed have found their way through
clandestine networks involving rogue arms broker, primary military companies, shady
airlines companies and local trans-border smugglers to exacerbate ethno-religious
tension, facilitate the growth of new ones in the country and the terrorists continue with
their activities against the state. Consequently, Small Arms and Light Weapons have
found their ways into civilian hands from official sources due to a combination of
factors, including the breakdown of state structure, lax control over national armouries
and poor service condition for security personnel. Armed robbery and other act of
terrorism are rampant and coercive across the Nigerian North-east borders; protection
and vigilance justice are replacing the incapacitated state security racket. According to
Wesley (2007), globalization also makes nation-state’s border to become vulnerable to
western capitalist manipulation through Military Industrial Complex (MIC).
3) Trafficking in Persons: Over the years, the Nigerian state has come to the limelight as
a country aiding or facilitating trafficking in persons; which may not be unconnected
with poor border paradigm and surveillances in the country. Ingwe et al. (2012)
attributed the porous border regime of Nigeria as aiding trans-border crimes,
particularly trafficking in persons for illicit business in Europe. They claim that the
UNHCR, a UN agency concerned with this issue, confirms the Italian Connection story
by stating that wealthy and criminally savvy human traffickers currently arrange with
parents of girls and women from southern Nigerian states, including the Niger Delta,
with the promise of providing them with lucrative jobs that would enable each of them
to earn about US$1,272 in Libya. The criminals first transported the girls and women
through the airport in Kano, northern Nigeria, after obtaining fake passports issued
under false names. However, they later changed their strategy and began trafficking
people through the north-eastern neighbor of Nigeria, the Niger Republic, to Libya
before transporting the women to European countries with the intention of using them
as slaves or prostitution. Large and permeable borders in Nigeria have been attributed
to this serious global crime (IRIN, 2008). This finger-pointing at Nigeria's open borders
for people trafficking is not unrelated to more significant concerns involving historical
socio-economic and political traumas and shortcomings that Nigeria, like other African
nations, have suffered. Human trafficking is defined as the recruitment, transportation,
transfer, hiding, harboring, and trade of people while using coercive control over
helpless people. It also includes the abuse of power positions and the exploitation of
people's vulnerabilities (UNESCO, 2006). Human trafficking has been an issue around
the world for over 12 million individuals who are compelled to work for the benefit of
others, but it was most prevalent in north-eastern Nigeria in the middle of the 2000s
(ILO, 2005), involving roughly 2.4 million victims.
Border Insecurity and the Challenges of Transnational Terrorism in North East Nigeria
1623 Interdisciplinary Social Studies, 2(2), Nov 2022
4) Smuggling of goods: Border insecurity made it easier for force migrants in and from
the North-eastern Nigeria to smuggle in goods and services. Increasing migration has
facilitated the development of cross-border social networks that can be activated for
criminal or terrorist purposes (Osinuga, 2013). Smuggling has become more common
and varied with the opportunities provided by the rapid increase in volumes of
internationally traded commodities. The effectiveness of state controls on its borders
has typically depended on the nature of the smuggled commodity, the ease of
production, concealment and transport, the availability of legal substitutes, and the
nature and levels of consumer demand. Policing efforts in the North-east often fail to
eliminate the targeted activity due to the border terrain and some illegal routes in the
area. Arguing against the backdrop that there are many technical cross border crimes
and terrorism in the West African and North-eastern Nigeria in particular, Addo (2006)
indentified categories of cross border crimes and items smuggled into Nigeria from
West Africa and other places to include but not limited to: Small Arms; Recruitments
of Mercenaries and Child soldiers; Human Trafficking; Narcotics; Money Laundering
and Internet. According to him, the porous, complex and disjointed nature of the
international boundaries of most countries in Africa and most especially in Nigeria are
some of the reasons for the incessant nature of such smuggling crimes.
Implications of Border Insecurity on North-East Nigeria
Among the numerous implications of border insecurity in the North-east are;
1) The emergence and unending of transnational terrorism in and beyond North-eastern
Nigeria;
2) Losing of lives of several people in North-eastern Nigeria as corroborated by Kallon
(of the United Nations) who stated that Boko Haram attacks for this ten years has
claimed the lives of no fewer than 27,000 civilians in north-east Nigeria (Ajayi, 2019);
3) Proliferation of weapons in the hands of civilian people either for self defence or ethnic
militia activities;
4) The discouraging of direct foreign investment in states like Adamawa, Borno and Yobe,
due fear of terrorist attacks and abduction of foreign nationalities;
5) The retarding of cross border trade at both official and non-official levels due to the
risk involved. For instance, the route from Maiduguri to Gamboru/Ngala to Cameroon
and to other north and Central Africa countries; the route from Bama/Banki to
Cameroon; as well as the one along the Lake Chad have suffered several attacks of
commuters, transporters; where some traders were killed, some abducted together with
their goods, hence the military closed those roads for security reasons;
6) The attacking of some Nigerian villages/communities along the common border
(frontline settlers) suffered attacks, collection of their goods or wealth by both the
foreign military personnel for what those MJTF members called ‘assisting the terrorist’
and the terrorist on the other hand, suspecting them of reporting their movement to the
security personnel and lastly from cross fire or stray bullets;
7) the military claimed that the terrorists also use this terrain to bolster their personnel in
terms of weapons and other foot soldiers from Libya, Mali, and even beyond; the
military authorities halted agricultural activities in the region, and farmers,
Border Insecurity and the Challenges of Transnational Terrorism in North East Nigeria
1624 Interdisciplinary Social Studies, 2(2), Nov 2022
fishermen/women, and pastoralists operating along Lake Chad were also expelled for
security reasons;
8) The fleeing for safety or joining the criminal gangs by hitherto innocent people. Many
innocent persons hitherto dwelling in the frontline states and those doing business along
the borders suffered untold hardship from various quotas (military or terrorist assaults,
where each of the parties accuse those civilians for siding/supporting the other). Some
young men and women in those places either relocate from those frontline communities
to safer places or join the terrorists for their survival; and
9) The affecting of Nigeria’s image, its diplomatic relations and foreign policy both in
positive and negative aspects (Ibrahim, 2014). Fighting the transnational terrorism has
prompted countries like Niger, Chad, Cameroon and Nigeria to relate with each other
so as to halt the advances of the transnational terrorist group with several diplomatic
visits, the formation of Multinational Joint Task Force (MJTF) operating along the Lake
Chad axis. Juxtapose, Some Nigerian refugees in those countries are said to be
maltreated and suspected as terrorists by the people hosting them and security personnel
of the neighbouring countries. The refugees were seen as vagabonds and constitute
nuisance in and to those francophone countries which prompted untimely deportation
of some of them to Nigeria (Nurudeen & Adekola, 2014). Boko Haram terrorism has made
several countries to see Nigeria as terrorist battle ground, either to recruit and train
terrorists or to capture and take possession, especially the northern eastern axis; as Boko
Haram is one of the acknowledged terrorist groups in Sahel and is associated with Al-
Qaeda/ISIL (Ibrahim, 2014).
CONCLUSION
Even though the rising spread of terrorism is no doubt one of the security issues facing
contemporary world, border insecurity in Northeast Nigeria has created, nurtured and sustained
the menace of domestic and international terrorism with lot of casualties in terms of human
beings and devastation of cities. This act has increasingly constituted a big threat to peace and
security in Northeast Nigeria. Border insecurity is a strong motivating factor which must be
checked at all cost by all hands for Nigeria with a promising economy to exist and exert its
authority in continental and global power configuration.
To secure and revive the Nigerian state and economy, the under-listed recommendations
are imperative:
1) Nigeria should as a matter of urgency pay attention to it frontline states and border town
settlers as they serves as the gate way from the North-east. This is to particularly provide
good security, medical, educational and other facilities to make the people settling there
to be loyal and supportive to the state against any alien movements;
2) The welfare and wellbeing of the security operatives at the borders, especially in the
North-east should not be taken for granted as that may jeopardized the nation’s revenue
generation, national security and development;
3) Authorities are to acquire and deploy drones to the North-east border for maximum
security;
4) While the recent closure of border by Nigerian authority is commendable, she is
required to boost deeper collaborations between the various security operatives in the
Border Insecurity and the Challenges of Transnational Terrorism in North East Nigeria
1625 Interdisciplinary Social Studies, 2(2), Nov 2022
land and border agencies so as to generate intelligent information, as well as the
standardization of policies against cross border crimes and transnational terrorism;
5) The governments of Nigeria, Chad, Cameroon, and Niger should redoubled their efforts
and strengthen border security nexus that will prevent the spread of transnational
terrorism and curb proliferations of SALW across their common borders;
6) The Multinational Joint Tasks Forces (MJTF) formed as a response to transnational
terrorism, by Nigeria, Niger, Chad and Cameroon republics should be well funded to
perform maximally; and
7) Nigeria should harmonize all relevant local and international legal frameworks for the
security of lives on the polity and in fighting global terrorism.
REFERENCES
Addo, P. (2006). Cross Border Criminal Activities in West Africa : Options for Effective
Responses.
Agbedahin, K. (2014). From control to parasitism: Interrogating the roles of border control
agencies on the Ghana–Togo border. African Security Review, 23(4).
https://doi.org/10.1080/10246029.2014.955864
Ajayi, O. (2019, August 1). Boko Haram insurgency far from over — UN. Vanguard.
Bashir, M. (2013, August 2). Nigeria: Defence Headquarters - Insurgents’ Trainer Captured
in Niger Rep. Daily Trust.
Böhmelt, T., Bove, V., & Nussio, E. (2020). Can Terrorism Abroad Influence Migration
Attitudes at Home? American Journal of Political Science, 64(3).
https://doi.org/10.1111/ajps.12494
Ekpenyong, J. (1993). Prospects and constraints for Cameroun-Nigeria Socio-economic
Cooperation along the Eastern border. Development of Border Regions.
Ellis, T., & Akpala, J. (2011). Making Sense of the Relationship between Trafficking in
Persons, Human Smuggling, and Organised Crime: The Case of Nigeria. Police Journal,
84(1). https://doi.org/10.1350/pojo.2011.84.1.507
Ering, S. O. (2011). Trans-border Crime and Its Socio-economic Impact on Developing
Economies. Journal of Sociology and Social Anthropology, 2(2).
https://doi.org/10.1080/09766634.2011.11885550
Ewetan, O. O., & Urhie, E. (2014). Insecurity and socio-economic development in Nigeria.
Journal of Sustainable Development Studies, 5(1).
Hamidu, I. (2017). Political science made easy. God’s Will Publishers.
Ibrahim, Y. I. (2014). Boko Haram insurgence and its implications for Nigerian foreign policy.
In I. Bello (Ed.), National Security and Development in Contemporary Nigeria (Vol. 2).
College Press Ibadan.
Iheanacho, E. N., & Ohazurike, E. U. (2019). Border Security and the Operations of Boko
Haram Terrorism in Nigeria. African Journal of Social and Behavioural Sciences, 9(1).
ILO. (2005). Reports on Global Alliance Against Forced Labour.
Ingwe, R., Mboto, W. A., & Ugwu, U. (2012). Transnational crime, human rights violation and
human trafficking in Nigeria’s oil-rich Niger Delta. Romanian Journal of Society and
Politics, 3, 65–93.
Border Insecurity and the Challenges of Transnational Terrorism in North East Nigeria
1626 Interdisciplinary Social Studies, 2(2), Nov 2022
IRIN. (2008). Niger-Nigeria: Porous border aids human trafficking. Refworld.
Krause, K. (2007). The challenges of small arms and light weapons. The 1st Conference of
International Peace Academy.
Mailabari, N., & Hamidu, I. (2015). Developing Nigeria’s border paradigm: The panacea for
national security, socio-economic and political development. Developing Countries
Studies, 5(21), 154–161.
Mbah, C. C. (2012). African politics: An introduction. Rex Charles & Patrick Publication.
Moulaye, Z. (2009). Finding responses to trans-border crime in West Africa: The role of
parliaments.
Musah, A.-F. (2002). Small Arms: A Time Bomb under West Afric’s Democratization Process.
Brown J. World Aff., 9, 239.
Nelson, R. O. J., Conley, H. A., Schaffer, T. C., Bodurian, B., Kraut, J., Cipoletti, T. J.,
Dukkipati, U., & Walker, R. J. (2010). Border security in a time of reformation: Two
international case studies-Poland and India. A Report of the CSIS Homeland Security
and Counterterrorism Program, Europe ….
Nurudeen, S. L., & Adekola, A. A. (2014). International terrorism and national security in
Nigeria: An appraisal. In National security and development in contemporary Nigeria
(Vol. 2). College Press Ibadan.
Osinuga, O. O. O. (2013). Nigeria, Boko Haram - Cutting Corners and the Illusion of Speedy
Conflict Resolution. SSRN Electronic Journal. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2260446
Soehl, T., & Waldinger, R. (2012). Inheriting the homeland? Intergenerational transmission of
cross-border ties in migrant families. American Journal of Sociology, 118(3).
https://doi.org/10.1086/667720
Taiwo, A. (2010). Terror in their Land. The Nation of Sunday.
Umara, I. (2014). National interest and foreign policy options for Nigeria in the Central
African Sub-region. Joyce Publishers.
UNESCO. (2006). Human trafficking in Nigeria: root causes and recommendations. UNESCO
Digital Library.
Wesley, M. (2007). Transnational crime and security threats in Asia.
Wikipedia. (2016). Transnationalism. Wikipedia.
Williams, P. (2012). Transnational organized crime. In Security Studies (pp. 525–541).
Routledge.
Yenwong-Fai, U. (2012, May 12). Border porosity and Boko Haram as a regional threat. ISS:
Institute for Security Studies.