The Settlement of Election Disputes by Bawaslu Reviewed from the Indonesian Justice System
Background: In order to bring about a government that is just, prosperous, and still stands on a democratic government, a country must be based on the implementation of elections or elections that are fair, honest, free, and secret from the principles of good governance. Aim: This article aims to explore the settlement of election disputes conducted by Bawaslu through the Indonesian justice system’s view. Method: This research is a normative legal study by reviewing or analyzing primary and secondary data by understanding the law as a device or positive norm in the legal system that regulates human life. Findings: The duration of the settlement of the case given to Bawaslu becomes a thing that is considered less wise in the effectiveness of the settlement of words and this is different from MK which is quite the opposite.
Copyright (c) 2022 Jamaluddin Jamaluddin
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International. that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.
