EVIDENCE-BASED POLICY: DATA’S USE IN SUPPORTING PUBLIC POLICY PROCESS
Bureaucratic reform became the backbone in changing the life of the nation and state. Through bureaucratic reform, arrangements are carried out on the system of government administration to make it more effective and efficient. One of the important bureaucratic reform agendas to realize is improving the quality of policies. Therefore, through this article, the author aims to provide an overview of the meaning of data / evidence in the public policy process. The writing of this article uses the literature review method, namely by utilizing secondary data or sources in the form of journals, books, documentation, the internet and various libraries that are relevant to the issues and topics of this article. The researcher concluded that the contribution of the EBP approach in the bureaucracy and policy of public institutions in each policy cycle can be a breakthrough in the birth of innovative policies. The use of research data is an important aspect in the success of government bureaucratic policies. Moreover, superior research as a source of data can identify problems more precisely and help governments design the most effective and innovative policy options.
Agindawati, I. N. (2019). Implementasi kebijakan publik dari perspektif penyelenggaraan pengawasan. Jurnal Inspirasi, 10(1). https://doi.org/10.35880/inspirasi.v10i1.68
Asmara, A. Y. (2012). Meningkatkan pemanfaatan hasil-hasil riset kebijakan dalam proses pembuatan kebijakan IPTEK di Indonesia. Journal of S&T Policy and R&D Management, 10(1).
Banta, K., & Karp, J. (2020). Rescuing scientific innovation from corporate bureaucracy. Harvard Business Review.
Cartwright, N., & Hardie, J. (2012). Evidence-based policy: A practical guide to doing it better. Oxford University Press.
Cookson, R. (2005). Evidence-based policy making in health care: What it is and what it isn’t. In Journal of Health Services Research and Policy (Vol. 10, Issue 2). https://doi.org/10.1258/1355819053559083
Denning, S. (2014). Why bureaucracy must die. Forbes.
Ferguson, J. (1994). The anti-politics machine:" development," depoliticization, and bureaucratic power in Lesotho. U of Minnesota Press.
Aditya, Z. F., Fuadi, A. B., & Yulistyaputri, R. (2021). Pentingnya evidence based policy making dalam pembuatan kebijakan publik di era pandemi (The importance of evidence-based policy making in public policy making in the pandemic era). SSRN Electronic Journal. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3776955
Fitria, N. J. L. (2021). Pembentukan badan riset dan inovasi nasional sebagai upaya menuju good governance dengan prinsip reformasi birokrasi. Wacana Publik, 15(02), 105–110.
Hajaz, M., & DS, N. (2021, May 6). Kepala BRIN sampaikan tiga arah dan tujuh target badan riset dan inovasi nasional. Nawacita.
Head, B. W. (2008). Three lenses of evidence-based policy. Australian Journal of Public Administration, 67(1). https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8500.2007.00564.x
Jonkers, K., & Sachwald, F. (2018). The dual impact of ‘excellent’ research on science and innovation: the case of Europe†. Science and Public Policy, 45(2). https://doi.org/10.1093/scipol/scx071
Kismartini, K., Suwitri, S., & Purnaweni, H. (2014). Analisis kebijakan publik. Universitas Terbuka.
Kwelju, J. (2019). Peran kebijakan publik dalam meningkatkan daya saing pariwisata di Kota Ambon Provinsi Maluku. BADATI, 1(1). https://doi.org/10.38012/jb.v1i1.197
Pollard, A., & Court, J. (2005). How civil society organisations use evidence to influence policy processes: A literature review (No. 249).
Pratikno. (2013). Pengambilan keputusan berdasarkan kepentingan politik. Antara News.
Sutcliffe, S., & Court, J. (2005). Evidence-based policymaking?: What is it?? How does it work?? What relevance for developing countries?? Young, November.
The PEW Charitable Trusts, & MacArthur Foundation. (2014). Evidence-based policymaking: A guide for effective government.
Copyright (c) 2022 Isnaeni Yuliani, Endang Larasati, Kismartini Kismartini, Tri Yuningsih

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International. that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.







