Comparative study: Indonesian and Indian government policies in managing the problem of dual citizenship

Authors

  • Yulianto Syahyu Universitas Bhayangkara Jakarta Raya

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.55324/iss.v4i2.793

Keywords:

dual citizenship, Indonesian diaspora, Indian diaspora, law number 12 of 2006 concerning citizenship, Overseas Citizenship of India (OCI)

Abstract

The Indonesian diaspora continues to fight for the right to dual citizenship in various countries around the world. The research aims to explore the concepts of limited dual citizenship and the concept of dual citizenship within the context of India with a study of cross-country analysis of Indonesia and India. The study employs normative legal research to analyze dual citizenship policies in these two countries, focusing on the relevant laws and regulations of each country. Furthermore, it utilizes descriptive comparative analysis to provide a comprehensive and systematic comparison of dual citizenry policies between the two countries. The results show that the Indonesian government's policy on the demand for dual citizenship is different in both countries. In addition, there are differences and similarities in the approaches taken by both countries, especially in the Overseas Citizenship of India (OCI) policy and the dual citizenship policy. This research could provide valuable insights for Indonesia in crafting similar policies that facilitate easier access and engagement for its diasa.

References

Astuti, D. (1999). Jejak Seribu Tangan. Liberty.

Baser, B., & Féron, É. (2022). Host state reactions to home state diaspora engagement policies: Rethinking state sovereignty and limits of diaspora governance. Global Networks, 22(2). https://doi.org/10.1111/glob.12341

Darmoyo, S., & Adi, R. (2007). Trafiking Anak untuk Pekerja Rumah Tangga: Kasus Jakarta. Pusat Kajian Pembangunan Masyarakat, Unika Atmajaya bekerjasama dengan USAID, Solidarity Center, JCMC.

Elo, M., Täube, F. A., & Servais, P. (2022). Who is doing “transnational diaspora entrepreneurship”? Understanding formal identity and status. Journal of World Business, 57(1). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jwb.2021.101240

Galstyan, N. (2023). Diaspora–Homeland Relations Re-examined. In The Armenian Diaspora and Stateless Power. Bloomsbury. https://doi.org/10.5040/9780755648245.0010

Hamzah, A. A. (2020). Analisis Perkembangan Harga Bahan Pangan Pokok di Pasar Domestik dan Internasional. Hamzah.

Heckman, J. J., Pinto, R., Savelyev, P. A., Blair, C., Benjamin, D., Browning, M., Cattan, S., Dodge, K., Duckworth, A., & Finklestein, A. (2012). Web Appendix to Understanding the Mechanisms Through Which an Influential Early Childhood Program Boosted Adult Outcomes. American Economic Review.

Ho, E. L.-E., Parren?as, R. S., & Yeoh, B. S. A. (2025). Migration and citizenship pathways in/beyond Asia. Ethnic and Racial Studies, 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1080/01419870.2024.2441910

Husni, L. (2010). Pengantar Hukum Ketenagakerjaan. Rajawali Pers.

Mahendra, A., & Harefa, B. (2020). Perlindungan Hukum Terhadap Identitas Anak Sebagai Pelaku Tindak Pidana Dalam Proses Peradilan Pidana. Jurnal Kertha Semaya, 8(10), 1629–1649.

Manulang, S. (2001). Pokok-pokok Hukum Ketenagakerjaan di Indonesia. Bhineka Cipta.

Marrom, M. A. N., Roesminingsih, E., Yulianingsih, W., & Khamidi, A. (2024). Public Relations Management in Building the School Image at Sekolah Indonesia Johor Bahru. International Journal of Emerging Research and Review, 2(4), 000087. https://doi.org/10.56707/ijoerar.v2i4.87

Mustafa, M. E. (2007). Prinsip-Prinsip Beracara Dalam Penegakan Hukum Paten di Indonesia Dikatikan Dengan TRiPs-WTO. PT Alumni.

Orjuela, C. (2025). The ‘ideal citizen’ abroad: engaging Rwanda’s young generation diaspora. Globalizations, 22(1), 34–50. https://doi.org/10.1080/14747731.2023.2275363

Prabowo, R. (2010). Kebijakan Pemerintah Dalam Mewujudkan Ketahanan Pangan Di Indonesia. Mediagro, 62(2), 62–73.

Ramdhani, H. (2024). Political Negotiations in The Issue of Dual Citizenship in Indonesia. Proceeding of International Conference on Digital, Social, and Science, 1(01), 305–312.

Soedarjadi. (2009). Hak dan Kewajiban Pekerja – Pengusaha. Pustaka Yustisia.

Suprantio, S. (2014). “ Testimonium De Auditu ” Dalam Peradilan Pidana Binding Force of the Constitutional Court Decision on “ Testimonium De Auditu ” in Criminal Judiciary. Yudisial, 7(65), 34–52.

Sutedi, A. (2009). Hukum Perburuhan. Sinar Grafika.

Tajuddin, A., & Stern, J. (2015). From Brown Dutchmen to Indo-Americans: Changing Identity of the Dutch-Indonesian (Indo) Diaspora in America. International Journal of Politics, Culture and Society, 28(4). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10767-015-9197-z

Tan, Y., & Liu, X. (2022). China’s Evolving Diaspora Engagement Policy: Transnational Linkages And Stakeholder Perceptions. Diaspora: A Journal of Transnational Studies, 22(2). https://doi.org/10.3138/diaspora.22.2.2022.06.16

Tan, Y., Liu, X., & Rosser, A. (2021). Transnational linkages, power relations and the migration–development nexus: China and its diaspora. Asia Pacific Viewpoint, 62(3). https://doi.org/10.1111/apv.12323

Wijayanti, A. (2009). Hukum Ketenagakerjaan Pasca Reformasi. Sinar Grafika.

Downloads

Published

2025-01-28